Learn Marxism

Sankar Srinivasan

Marxism approach to study Political Science, Philosophy and Economics. This is a dedicated podcast for marxian study, with episodes of Original Books written by Marxist Leaders.  Hosted by Sankar Srinivasanhttps://linktr.ee/sankarsrinivasan  Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a read less
ArtsArts

Episodes

On the Jewish Question : Karl Marx
23-11-2020
On the Jewish Question : Karl Marx
On the Jewish Question" is a work by Karl Marx, written in 1843, and first published in Paris in 1844 under the German title "Zur Judenfrage" in the Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücher. It was one of Marx's first attempts to develop what would later be called the materialist conception of history. The essay criticizes two studies by Marx's fellow Young Hegelian Bruno Bauer on the attempt by Jews to achieve political emancipation in Prussia. Bauer argued that Jews could achieve political emancipation only by relinquishing their particular religious consciousness, since political emancipation requires a secular state, which he assumes does not leave any "space" for social identities such as religion. According to Bauer, such religious demands are incompatible with the idea of the "Rights of Man". True political emancipation, for Bauer, requires the abolition of religion. Marx uses Bauer's essay as an occasion for his own analysis of liberal rights, arguing that Bauer is mistaken in his assumption that in a "secular state" religion will no longer play a prominent role in social life, and giving as an example the pervasiveness of religion in the United States, which, unlike Prussia, had no state religion. In Marx's analysis, the "secular state" is not opposed to religion, but rather actually presupposes it. The removal of religious or property qualifications for citizens does not mean the abolition of religion or property, but only introduces a way of regarding individuals in abstraction from them. On this note Marx moves beyond the question of religious freedom to his real concern with Bauer's analysis of "political emancipation". Marx concludes that while individuals can be "spiritually" and "politically" free in a secular state, they can still be bound to material constraints on freedom by economic inequality, an assumption that would later form the basis of his critiques of capitalism. A number of scholars and commentators regard "On the Jewish Question", and in particular its second section, which addresses Bauer's work "The Capacity of Present-day Jews and Christians to Become Free", as antisemitic; however, a number of others disagree. Hosted by Sankar Srinivasan. https://sankarsrinivasan.com Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information
Comments on James Mill : by Karl Marx
20-11-2020
Comments on James Mill : by Karl Marx
Karl Marx 1844 Comments on James Mill, Éléments D’économie Politique Written: in the first half of 1844; First published: in full in Marx/Engels, Gesamtausgabe, Erste Abteilung, Band 3, Berlin, 1932; First English Translation: by Clemens Dutt for the Collected Works. Marx used a translation of Mill’s book, by J. T. Parisot, Paris, 1823. Marx kept a wide variety of notebooks throughout his life. He often used them to aid in his study of other authors. A common practice was to transcribe long sections from a particular book, and then comment on those sections at some length. During his time in Paris, Marx kept nine notebooks – largely dedicated to his growing interest in economics. They date from the end of 1843 to January 1845. The “Paris Notebooks” deal with books by J. B. Say, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, McCulloch, James Mill, Destott de Tracy, Sismondi, Jeremy Bentham, Boisguillebert, Lauderdale, Schütz, List, Skarbek and Buret. Most of Marx's accompanying commentary on these authors is very fragmentary; and, ideas are often restated far more clearly in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts (1844). The exception to this is the material addressing James Mill's book, Elements of Political Economy (London, 1821). Marx used an 1823 French translation of Mill's book. The Mill part of the Paris Notebooks is quite lengthy – it starts on page 25 of the fourth notebook and continues into the fifth. Following a lengthy selection of Mill excerpts, Marx suddenly “veered off” and began developing a larger, tangential thought. After writing his thoughts out, Marx returned to more Mill transcription. Soon, a second digression followed. Upon its completion, Marx finished up his summarizing. (Only the middle three parts of this Mill section of the Paris Notebooks are presented below – in other words, most of the opening and all of closing Mill transcriptions are omitted). This document is very close in nature to the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts. Some have suggested that the ideas contained herein might be a glimpse into the missing bulk of the EPM second manuscript. Hosted by Sankar Srinivasan. https://sankarsrinivasan.com Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Chapter 6 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
14-11-2020
Chapter 6 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right - Chapter 6 Civil Society and The Estates 308-313 Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie) is a manuscript written by German political philosopher Karl Marx in 1843. Unpublished during his lifetime (except for the introduction, published in Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücher in 1844), it is a manuscript in which Marx comments on fellow philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's 1820 book Elements of the Philosophy of Right paragraph by paragraph. One of Marx's major criticisms of Hegel in the document is the fact that many of his dialectical arguments begin in abstraction. This work contains the formulations of Marx's particular alienation theory, which was informed by Ludwig Feuerbach's work. Narrative of the work develops around analysis of the relations between civil society and political society, including Marx's most famous commentaries on the function of religion in the introduction. Written: 1843-44; Source: Marx’s Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843); Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Ed. Joseph O’Malley; Translated: Annette Jolin and Joseph O’Malley; Online text: Marx/Engels Internet Archive; Read by: Kwame Genov (youtube.com/kwamegenovv) by 2017 Reference: Hegel's Philosophy or Right. PDF. Hosted by Sankar Srinivasan. https://sankarsrinivasan.com Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Chapter 5 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
14-11-2020
Chapter 5 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right - Chapter 5 The Estates 304-307 Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie) is a manuscript written by German political philosopher Karl Marx in 1843. Unpublished during his lifetime (except for the introduction, published in Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücher in 1844), it is a manuscript in which Marx comments on fellow philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's 1820 book Elements of the Philosophy of Right paragraph by paragraph. One of Marx's major criticisms of Hegel in the document is the fact that many of his dialectical arguments begin in abstraction. This work contains the formulations of Marx's particular alienation theory, which was informed by Ludwig Feuerbach's work. Narrative of the work develops around analysis of the relations between civil society and political society, including Marx's most famous commentaries on the function of religion in the introduction. Written: 1843-44; Source: Marx’s Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843); Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Ed. Joseph O’Malley; Translated: Annette Jolin and Joseph O’Malley; Online text: Marx/Engels Internet Archive; Read by: Kwame Genov (youtube.com/kwamegenovv) by 2017 Reference: Hegel's Philosophy or Right. PDF. Hosted by Sankar Srinivasan. https://sankarsrinivasan.com Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Chapter 4 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
14-11-2020
Chapter 4 - Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right
Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right - Chapter 4 The Legislature 298-303 Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie) is a manuscript written by German political philosopher Karl Marx in 1843. Unpublished during his lifetime (except for the introduction, published in Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücher in 1844), it is a manuscript in which Marx comments on fellow philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's 1820 book Elements of the Philosophy of Right paragraph by paragraph. One of Marx's major criticisms of Hegel in the document is the fact that many of his dialectical arguments begin in abstraction. This work contains the formulations of Marx's particular alienation theory, which was informed by Ludwig Feuerbach's work. Narrative of the work develops around analysis of the relations between civil society and political society, including Marx's most famous commentaries on the function of religion in the introduction. Written: 1843-44; Source: Marx’s Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843); Publisher: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Ed. Joseph O’Malley; Translated: Annette Jolin and Joseph O’Malley; Online text: Marx/Engels Internet Archive; Read by: Kwame Genov (youtube.com/kwamegenovv) by 2017 Reference: Hegel's Philosophy or Right. PDF. Hosted by Sankar Srinivasan. https://sankarsrinivasan.com Listen with Sub-Titles on https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6GUNO0aHF37vH9ecAfek0nClFZdDP28a See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.